
![]() |
Feedback If something you read in this newsletter gets your goat or triggers a thought please write us at ESTUARY Feedback, 2101 Webster, #500, Oakland, CA 94612. "Your April 1994 issue included an article [by Frank Hartzell] titled Vernal Tangle which asserts that 'such mitigation banks...have been endorsed...by major environmental groups and agencies.' I would be very interested in knowing exactly what groups and agencies endorse mitigation banking for vernal pools. The Sierra Club has tremendous concerns about mitigation banking in general, and it is common scientific knowledge that vernal pools are a unique type of natural wetland that is virtually impossible to 'create.'" Jackie McCort, Sierra Club Frank Hartzell writes, by way of clarification, that "Wetland mitigation banking in general has been supported by a wide range of environmental leaders and developers, according to Hal Thomas of Cal Fish & Game. But mitigation banks for vernal pools are another issue. The Army Corps is monitoring vernal pool creation and mitigation projects in Chico, Roseville and Sacramento. Reports from these studies have been interpreted as good news by some local biologists and developers, but no major environmental group has taken a stand based on the reports." Several readers correctly pointed out that the fish pictured in our January issue was a tule perch, not a hardhead as the caption suggested (the editor made a mistake). One reader kindly provided these comparative illustrations. |
||||||||
|
|||||||||